Every component of return loss for your inputs, built up from refunded revenue and reverse-logistics cost, then offset by resale recovery to reach the net total. Costs add to the loss; recovery is subtracted. These are estimates — real recovery and damage vary item by item.
Component
Calculation
Amount
Refunded revenue
100 returns × 50 AOV
5,000
Reverse shipping
100 × 8
800
Restocking
100 × 3
300
Damage write-off
20 damaged × 20 cost
400
Less: resale recovery
80 good × 50 × 70%
−2,800
Total return loss
Refunds + costs − recovery
3,700
Estimates only — not financial, tax, or professional advice.
100% private — every number you enter is calculated in your browser and never sent to our servers.
What it calculates: Total Return Loss, Loss per Order, Recovered Value, Margin Impact.
Updated 5 June 2026 · Transparent assumptions
Shipping back, handling, condition loss, and the margin never earned
The full cost of a return is the reverse postage, the labour to receive and inspect it, the value lost on units that cannot be resold at full price, and the contribution on a sale that did not stick.
Businesses that budget only for the refund underestimate the total by a wide margin. On a low-margin item the handling alone can exceed the profit the sale would have made, which makes a high-return line loss-making at any volume.
The damaged share and the recovery rate do most of the damage
Some proportion of returns arrives in a condition that cannot go back on the shelf at full price. The recovery rate is what you get for those — an open-box discount, a liquidation price, or nothing.
These two inputs are where the cost concentrates. A 20% damaged share with 40% recovery is a much worse business than a 5% share with 80% recovery, even at an identical return rate.
A category with 30% returns has to price for 30% returns
If returns are predictable — and in apparel they are — the cost is not an exception, it is a cost of goods. Pricing as though every order sticks guarantees the margin is wrong on every single unit.
Working the loss per order out of this calculator and adding it to unit cost gives a price that survives the real return rate. It is also what makes free returns affordable rather than a slow bleed.
Better sizing data and honest photography beat any returns process
The cheapest return is the one that never happens. Detailed size guides with real measurements, fit feedback from previous buyers, photography that shows scale and true colour, and a description that does not flatter all reduce the rate at source.
Beyond that, some returns are worth not receiving at all. For low-value items the reverse shipping and handling can exceed the recoverable value, and refunding without requiring the return is simply cheaper.
Sources & References
Figures on this page are checked against primary, authoritative sources. Links open in a new tab.
Results are estimates for planning and analysis based on the figures you enter. They are not accounting, tax, or financial advice — verify with your own records and a qualified professional before making decisions.
Published the calculator with its formula, worked example, assumptions, limitations and a bespoke guide, and added an automated formula test suite covering it.
Tested the full return cost chain — reverse shipping, restocking, damaged units and resale recovery — against an independent recomputation.
Tested that a zero return rate produces no loss at all, and that a higher damaged share always increases the total cost.
Add this calculator to your site
Responsive embed — and private: nothing your visitors type leaves their browser.