How the budget, the revenue it targets, and the implied return relate at your chosen mode and ROAS. The marginal-ROAS rows stress-test the plan: if real ROAS lands below target, the same budget returns less, so plan with a conservative figure.
Line
Amount
How it is derived
Ad spend (budget)
12500.00
Target revenue ÷ target ROAS
Target ROAS
4.00x
Revenue earned per unit of ad spend
Implied revenue
50000.00
Entered directly
Spend as % of revenue
25.00%
Ad spend ÷ revenue
Revenue if ROAS = 3.0x
37500.00
Same budget, one point lower ROAS
Revenue if ROAS = 5.0x
62500.00
Same budget, one point higher ROAS
Estimates only — not financial, tax, or professional advice.
100% private — every number you enter is calculated in your browser and never sent to our servers.
What it calculates: Required ad spend, Implied revenue, Spend as % of revenue.
Updated 5 June 2026 · Transparent assumptions
Budget from a target, or revenue from a budget
Planning a quarter starts from a revenue number and asks what it costs to reach: spend is the target divided by the ROAS you can sustain. Forecasting starts from an approved budget and asks what it should deliver: revenue is spend multiplied by ROAS.
They are the same relationship read in opposite directions, and confusing them is how budgets get set against targets nobody checked were affordable at the margin the business actually runs.
The percentage is the reciprocal of ROAS, and it is easier to argue about
A ROAS of 4 is 25% of revenue spent on advertising; a ROAS of 2 is 50%. The percentage form is the one that makes a plan obviously viable or obviously not, because it can be compared directly against gross margin.
If the implied marketing share exceeds your contribution margin, the plan loses money at every level of success. That check takes seconds and prevents the most expensive category of planning error.
The best audiences are bought first
The arithmetic is linear; ad platforms are not. Doubling spend rarely doubles revenue, because the cheapest and most responsive audiences are reached first and each additional unit of budget buys progressively less responsive attention.
So a doubled budget planned at today’s ROAS will very likely miss. Use a lower ROAS assumption for the incremental portion, or plan the increase in steps and re-measure at each one rather than committing the whole rise at once.
Considered purchases break the within-month comparison
For anything with a considered purchase cycle, this month’s spend produces some of next month’s revenue. Dividing one month’s revenue by the same month’s spend understates efficiency while scaling up and flatters it while scaling down.
Where the lag is material, compare a trailing revenue window against the spend that preceded it, and treat any single month’s ratio as noise rather than as a signal to act on.
Sources & References
Figures on this page are checked against primary, authoritative sources. Links open in a new tab.
Results are estimates for planning and analysis based on the figures you enter. They are not accounting, tax, or financial advice — verify with your own records and a qualified professional before making decisions.
Published the calculator with its formula, worked example, assumptions, limitations and a bespoke guide, and added an automated formula test suite covering it.
Tested both directions and round-tripped them: spend solved from a revenue target, fed back forward, must reproduce that target.
Tested that the implied marketing share of revenue is always the reciprocal of the ROAS entered.
Add this calculator to your site
Responsive embed — and private: nothing your visitors type leaves their browser.