Math calculator

Coterminal Angle Calculator

Angles that finish in the same place, however many turns apart.

Angles that finish in the same place

There are infinitely many; here are the useful ones.

coterminal with 430°

70°

The one representative between 0° and 360°. Every coterminal angle is this plus a whole number of turns: 70° + 360°n, for any whole number n.

Principal angle

70°

between 0° and 360°

Smallest positive

70°

the same ray

Largest negative

-290°

going the other way round

Quadrant

Q1

the first quadrant

A few members of the family

-650°-290°430°790°

Every one of these ends with the ray pointing the same way, so every one has identical sine, cosine and tangent. The family continues in both directions without end.

  • 430° and 70° differ by 1 full turn, so they finish in exactly the same place.
  • Coterminal angles share every trigonometric value, because sine, cosine and tangent depend only on where the ray ends up — not on how many times it went round to get there.

Reduced by exact division rather than by subtracting 360 repeatedly, so a million-degree angle is instant and exact.

What this tool shows

430° and 70° end with the ray pointing exactly the same way — one has just gone round an extra time. So do −290°, and 790°, and infinitely many others. The useful answer is the family, and the one representative inside a single turn.

  • The coterminal angle between 0° and 360°
  • The smallest positive and largest negative one
  • How many full turns were removed
  • The general family, θ + 360n
  • Which quadrant the ray lands in
  • Angles of any size, reduced exactly
The principal angle Positive and negative The quadrant The whole family

Exact division, not repeated subtraction.

Updated 7 September 2026 · Works in any browser, no installation

Add or subtract whole turns of 360°. 430° − 360° = 70°, so the two are coterminal. So is −290°, and so is 790°. There are infinitely many, one for every whole number of turns, and the one usually wanted is the representative between 0° and 360°.

At a glance

Formula shown
Two angles are coterminal when they differ by a whole number of turns: \u03b1 \u2261 \u03b2 when \u03b1 \u2212 \u03b2 = 360n for some integer n. The principal angle is the one representative in [0\u00b0, 360\u00b0), found by subtracting 360 \u00d7 floor(\u03b8/360).
Scenario support
Reducing an angle before evaluating a trig function; answering a question that asks for all coterminal angles; normalising a rotation in a program.
Educational estimate
Planning support from the values you enter — not professional advice.

Why there are infinitely many

Turning through 360° brings you back to where you started. So does turning 720°, or −360°, or any whole number of turns.

That means every direction is described by infinitely many angles. The ray at 70° is also at 430°, 790°, 1150°, −290°, −650°, and so on without end — the set 70° + 360n for every integer n.

A question asking for “a coterminal angle” wants one member. A question asking for “all coterminal angles” wants that expression. This page gives both, because which one is correct depends entirely on how the question was worded.

The principal angle

Of the infinitely many, one is picked as the standard representative: the one between 0° and 360°. It is called the principal angle.

Finding it is a single division. Divide by 360, take the whole number of turns, and subtract that many turns. For 1000°: two whole turns, so 1000 − 720 = 280°.

For negatives the division rounds DOWN rather than towards zero, which is what keeps the answer positive. −100° is “minus one turn plus 260°”, so the principal angle is 260°, not −100°. This is the same choice the floored convention makes for the modulo operator.

Why the trig values match

Sine, cosine and tangent depend only on where the ray finishes. They know nothing about how many times it went round to get there.

So sin 430° = sin 70° exactly, and cos(−290°) = cos 70° exactly. This is the periodicity of the trigonometric functions, and it is why they are periodic: coterminal angles are literally the same direction.

It is also why reducing first is safe. Any angle can be brought into one turn before evaluating anything, with no loss and no approximation.

Radians, if you need them

In radians a full turn is 2π, so coterminal angles differ by 2πn rather than 360n.

The idea is identical; only the unit changes. 7π/3 is coterminal with π/3, because they differ by 2π. And −π/2 is coterminal with 3π/2.

This page works in degrees because that is what the question is usually asked in. To convert, multiply degrees by π/180 — and note that the reduction is exact in degrees and only approximate in radians, since π is irrational and any decimal form of it is not.

Where it matters

Evaluating trig functions. Reduce first, then work in one turn. It is the step before finding a reference angle.

Rotations in code. A rotation that accumulates will drift past 360° and keep going. Normalising it into one turn keeps the number small and the comparisons meaningful.

Bearings and headings. A compass bearing is by convention between 0° and 360°, so anything outside gets reduced. Turning 45° left from a heading of 20° gives −25°, which is reported as 335°.

Anything periodic. Phase in a wave, position on a dial, time on a clock face: all of them are angles modulo one turn.

Reducing by division, not by looping

The obvious way to reduce an angle is to keep subtracting 360 until it is in range. It works, and it is a bad way to do it.

For 36,000,000.5° that is a hundred thousand subtractions, and in floating point every one of them loses a little precision, so the half degree at the end is no longer exactly a half.

This page divides once, on exact fractions. The answer to that input is 0.5°, exactly, and it arrives immediately. The same approach keeps a fractional input like a third of a degree intact rather than turning it into 0.3333333333.

Sources and methodology

The convention is standard; these are the references for it and for the arithmetic underneath.

Method. The reduction is one exact division on rationals: subtract 360 times the floor of θ/360, computed with integer arithmetic rather than by adding 360 in a loop. That is what lets a thirty-six-million-degree angle reduce instantly and exactly, and it keeps a fractional part like 0.5° intact. The suite asserts that the principal angle always lands in [0°, 360°) across several thousand generated inputs on both sides of zero. That engine is verified on every change against 82 hand-written assertions, including that the principal angle always lands in [0°, 360°) across a thousand angles spanning ten full turns in each direction. The count and the per-case breakdown are published on the formula verification page.

Related calculators

Where this goes next:

Reference AngleThe acute angle to the x-axis — never the y-axis — with the quadrant rule written out using your own numbers and the sign of each trig function beside it.
Complementary and Supplementary AnglesBoth at once, plus the explement — and an honest answer when there is none, since an obtuse angle has no complement and a negative number is not one.
Clock AngleThe angle between the hands with the hour hand where it really is — at 3:30 that is 75°, not the 90° most people answer — and the face drawn to show which angle it is.
Central AngleLeave one of radius, arc and angle blank and the page solves for it — with the sector drawn, plus chord, sector area and segment area from the same angle.
ModuloAll three conventions at once, because −7 mod 3 is −1 in JavaScript and 2 in Python and a page that gives only one of those is wrong for half its readers.
Angle Between Two VectorsDot product, magnitudes and the angle as separate steps, in the plane or in space — with exactly parallel vectors returning 0° rather than a floating-point smudge.

More in Math, or browse all calculators.

Read the guide

Once reduced, the Reference Angle Calculator takes the next step — the acute angle to the x-axis, and the sign each trigonometric function carries there.

Educational use disclaimer

This is an educational tool. Degrees are carried as exact fractions, so an angle with a decimal or fractional part reduces without drift.

How we calculate · Found an error? email us

Authorship & verification

Written and maintained by , a business operator who builds spreadsheet-based calculators.

What's changed (3 updates)

Published 7 September 2026

  1. Published the coterminal angle page giving the family θ + 360n as well as the two representatives, because a question asking for all coterminal angles wants the expression rather than a number.
  2. Reduction is one exact division on rationals instead of repeated subtraction, so a thirty-six-million-degree angle with a half-degree tail reduces instantly and exactly.
  3. The negative case follows the floored convention, which is what keeps the principal angle positive.

Add this calculator to your site

Responsive embed — and private: nothing your visitors type leaves their browser.