Business calculator

Quick Ratio Calculator

The acid test, computed by both formulas in circulation.

Your quick ratio

Both formulas at once.

$
$

Short-term investments you could sell this week.

$

Counted by current and quick, never by cash ratio.

$

Counted by the current ratio only — this is the line the quick ratio removes.

$

Also removed by the quick ratio: you cannot pay a supplier with next year’s insurance.

$

The wedge between the two quick-ratio formulas.

$

Everything due within a year — payables, short-term debt, accruals.

Subtractive formula

1.32 : 1

Above 1: liquid assets cover current liabilities without touching inventory.

Subtractive

1.32

CA − inventory − prepaid

Additive

1.20

cash + securities + receivables

They differ by

0.12

exactly your other current assets

Current ratio

2.20

for contrast — counts inventory

The two formulas differ by 0.12 here — which is exactly $30,000 of other current assets over $250,000 of liabilities. Quote the method with the number, or it is not comparable with anything.

What the quick ratio still trusts. It removes inventory but keeps receivables — $150,000 of them, or 0.60 times your current liabilities. A quick ratio that looks comfortable while customers take three months to pay is not liquidity; it is a promise. Read it beside days sales outstanding.

The acid test assumes you sell nothing more. It does not assume you collect nothing — that is the cash ratio.

What this tool shows

The quick ratio asks whether you could meet short-term obligations without selling any stock. There are two formulas for it in everyday use and they do not agree; this tool computes both, shows the exact size of the disagreement, and names what causes it.

  • Quick ratio by the subtractive formula
  • Quick ratio by the additive formula
  • The exact gap between them, and what causes it
  • The current ratio alongside, for contrast
  • Receivables as a multiple of current liabilities
  • Why the acid test still trusts your debtors
Both formulas at once Names the disagreement Read against DSO Named sources

Defaults to the subtractive formula, the commoner of the two.

Updated 8 September 2026 · Works in any browser, no installation

Quick ratio = liquid current assets ÷ current liabilities. The argument is entirely about which assets count as liquid — and the two standard answers differ by exactly your “other current assets” line.

At a glance

Formula shown
Subtractive: (current assets − inventory − prepaid expenses) ÷ current liabilities. Additive: (cash + marketable securities + receivables) ÷ current liabilities. The two differ by exactly other current assets ÷ current liabilities, and agree only when that line is zero.
Scenario support
Testing short-term solvency without relying on stock; comparing a company against itself across years on one consistent method; checking whether a published quick ratio used the same formula you did.
Educational estimate
Planning support from the values you enter — not professional advice.

Two formulas, two answers

Open two textbooks and you will find two definitions of the same ratio.

The subtractive formula starts from total current assets and takes out the illiquid ones: (current assets − inventory − prepaid expenses) ÷ current liabilities. It is the commoner of the two and the default here.

The additive formula builds the numerator from scratch out of the things it trusts: (cash + marketable securities + receivables) ÷ current liabilities.

Those look like the same instruction phrased two ways, and for a simple balance sheet they are. They part company the moment there is an “other current assets” line — short-term deposits, tax recoverable, amounts owed by group companies, derivative assets. Subtractive keeps those in, because it only removes inventory and prepayments. Additive leaves them out, because it only adds three named categories.

So the gap between the two is exactly that line divided by current liabilities. On the default figures in the tool, 30,000 of other current assets against 250,000 of liabilities makes the formulas differ by 0.12 — 1.32 against 1.20. That is not a rounding difference; it is nine per cent of the answer.

Neither is wrong. What is wrong is quoting the result without saying which you used, because the reader cannot reconstruct it and cannot compare it. If you are tracking your own ratio over time, the important thing is simply to pick one and never switch.

Why inventory comes out

The current ratio counts inventory at book value, in full, as though it were cash. The quick ratio’s entire reason for existing is that this is optimistic in three separate ways.

It takes time. Stock has to be sold before it becomes cash, and the days inventory outstanding figure says how long that normally takes. Ninety days of stock is not ninety days of liquidity.

It may not fetch book value. A business selling inventory quickly because it needs cash is a business discounting. The book figure assumes an orderly sale that the circumstances requiring the sale have already ruled out.

Some of it will never sell. Obsolete lines sit in the inventory figure at cost until someone writes them down, and the write-down usually lags the reality.

Prepayments come out for a blunter reason: they are not going to become cash at all. A year of insurance paid in advance is a genuine asset and a completely useless one for paying a supplier.

The size of the gap between current and quick is therefore a direct measurement of how much of a company’s apparent liquidity depends on selling things. For a retailer it is most of it; for a software business it is almost none.

What the acid test still trusts

Here is the part that gets missed. The quick ratio removes inventory — and keeps receivables. It assumes you sell nothing more, but it assumes every customer pays.

For most businesses receivables are the largest item in the numerator. So a quick ratio of 1.3 on a ledger collecting in 30 days and a quick ratio of 1.3 on a ledger collecting in 90 days describe completely different situations, and the ratio itself cannot distinguish them.

This is why the ratio is worth almost nothing read alone and quite a lot read beside days sales outstanding. DSO tells you how long the receivables in that numerator actually take to turn into money. If it is longer than the period over which the liabilities fall due, the ratio is describing cover you will not have in time.

The stricter test that removes receivables too is the cash ratio, and the distance between quick and cash is a measurement of how much of your liquidity is a promise rather than a balance.

The denominator nobody checks

Every adjustment so far has been to the top of the fraction. The bottom half — current liabilities — usually gets copied off the balance sheet unexamined, and it contains at least one line that will never consume cash.

Deferred revenue is the one that distorts most. Money a customer has already paid for something you have not yet delivered is a genuine current liability. But it is discharged by doing the work, not by paying it out. A business that bills annually in advance carries up to twelve months of it, which holds the quick ratio down permanently — and the ratio cannot tell that obligation apart from a supplier invoice due on Friday.

This is most of why subscription software businesses screen as illiquid on a test built for manufacturers. The liability is real; the cash requirement is not.

The current portion of long-term debt runs the other way. It is the strictest item in the denominator — a fixed amount on a fixed date, with none of the informal flexibility a trade payable carries. Two companies with identical current liabilities are in different positions if one of them is mostly term debt maturing next quarter.

So the denominator is worth splitting before the ratio is worth reading. Where a meaningful share of it is deferred revenue, calculate the ratio both ways and treat the higher number as the operating reality. The working capital calculator shows the same two sides in money rather than as a multiple, which usually makes the difference between those liabilities obvious.

Finding the numbers in a real balance sheet

The formula is easy. Locating its inputs in a set of published accounts is where people actually get stuck, because the captions rarely match the textbook words.

Cash is usually two lines, not one. “Cash and cash equivalents” sits on the balance sheet, but short-term deposits are often disclosed separately and sometimes sit inside “other current assets”. If you are using the additive formula, read the cash note before assuming the headline figure is complete.

Receivables need the net figure. Trade receivables are stated after the allowance for expected credit losses, which is what you want. What you do not want is to include “amounts owed by group undertakings” without asking whether they are actually collectible on demand — in a group with a struggling parent, frequently they are not.

Prepayments are often bundled. Many balance sheets show “prepayments and accrued income” as one line. Accrued income is revenue earned but not yet invoiced, which behaves like a receivable and arguably belongs in the numerator; prepayments do not. If the note does not split them, say which treatment you used.

Watch for a current portion of long-term debt. It belongs in current liabilities and is easy to miss, and missing it flatters every ratio on this page at once.

Where a caption is genuinely ambiguous, the honest move is to compute it both ways and see whether the conclusion changes. If it does not, the ambiguity did not matter. If it does, that is the finding, and it belongs in the write-up rather than being resolved silently.

What the quick ratio cannot tell you

Three limits.

It shares the current ratio’s period-end weakness. Settling payables from cash on the last day moves this ratio the same way it moves the current ratio — away from 1, magnifying whichever side you are on. The demonstration on the current ratio page applies here unchanged.

It cannot see receivable quality. A debtor ninety days overdue and a debtor about to pay look identical in the numerator, and a bad debt not yet written off inflates the ratio until someone recognises it.

There is no universal target. The often-repeated “1.0 or better” is a manufacturing heuristic. Supermarkets run far below it permanently and are not in difficulty, because their inventory converts to cash faster than their payables fall due — which is what a negative cash conversion cycle means.

Sources and methodology

The classification rules behind the numerator.

Method. Both formulas are computed by the same engine function differing only in the numerator it assembles, so the two figures cannot drift apart through separate code paths. The claim that they differ by exactly other current assets over current liabilities is not asserted in prose alone — it is fuzzed over five thousand generated balance sheets and required to hold to within a billionth on every one, alongside the strictness ordering current ≥ quick(subtractive) ≥ quick(additive) ≥ cash. The engine is verified on every change against 72 assertions shared with the rest of the liquidity cluster. The count and the per-case breakdown are published on the formula verification page.

Related calculators

Looser, stricter, and what the receivables are actually doing:

Current RatioShort-term assets over short-term debts, with the quick and cash tests beside it — and a live demonstration of how settling payables moves the number.
Cash RatioThe strictest liquidity test, shown as the last rung of a ladder with the money each step removes.
Working CapitalCurrent assets minus current liabilities, measured against what your cash conversion cycle actually requires.
DSODays sales outstanding by the simple ratio and by countback, with the floor your payment terms set separated from genuine lateness.
DIODays of stock on hand against cost of goods sold, with the turnover it implies and the revenue-denominator mistake priced beside it.
Cash Conversion CycleWork out the days between paying suppliers and being paid by customers, on one consistent day basis, then see what each day is worth in cash.

More in Business, or browse all calculators.

Educational use disclaimer

An educational tool for analysing a balance sheet from figures you enter. It is not a credit assessment or a substitute for advice from a qualified accountant.

How we calculate · Found an error? email us

Authorship & verification

Written and maintained by , a business operator who builds spreadsheet-based calculators.

What's changed (3 updates)

Published 8 September 2026

  1. Published a quick-ratio calculator that computes BOTH formulas in circulation rather than silently picking one. Subtractive takes current assets minus inventory minus prepaid; additive adds cash, securities and receivables. They differ by exactly the "other current assets" line, and on the default figures that is 1.32 against 1.20 — nine per cent of the answer.
  2. The identity that the two methods differ by otherCurrentAssets / currentLiabilities is fuzzed over five thousand generated balance sheets rather than argued, because the page uses it to explain WHY they disagree.
  3. States the limit the acid test is usually credited with not having: it removes inventory but keeps receivables, so a comfortable quick ratio on a ledger collecting in 90 days is a promise rather than liquidity. The page routes that question to the DSO calculator instead of hand-waving it.

Add this calculator to your site

Responsive embed — and private: nothing your visitors type leaves their browser.