How to read your result
The headline states which path leaves you wealthier at the horizon you chose, and by how much. The breakeven year — the first year buying's running wealth overtakes renting's — matters more than the single horizon number, because it tells you how long you'd need to stay for buying to actually pay off; if your horizon is shorter than the breakeven year, renting currently wins in this model, and if it's longer, buying does. The year-by-year table underneath shows exactly how both paths grow, so you can see whether the gap is widening or narrowing rather than trusting a single endpoint.
Worked example
A $420,000 home with 20% down ($84,000, plus $12,600 in closing costs at 3%), a 6.5% mortgage over 30 years ($2,124/mo principal & interest), 1.1% property tax, $1,800/yr insurance, 1% maintenance, and 3.5% annual appreciation — compared against $2,200/mo rent growing 3% a year, with the difference invested at a 6% return. Over a 7-year horizon, renting comes out about $22,000 ahead ($193,000 buyer wealth vs. $215,000 renter wealth) — the down payment, closing costs, and early interest-heavy mortgage years weigh on buying at first. Run the same assumptions out to 30 years and buying overtakes renting around year 12, then pulls further ahead as the fixed mortgage payment stops rising while rent keeps growing — by year 30, buyer wealth is roughly $1.10 million against $830,000 for renting.
Read the guide
For the payment side of this comparison worked through step by step, see Mortgage Payment vs. Total Cost of a Loan.